I would say that I like most of my career,
although there is a huge psychoanalytic bias – mostly from Freudian perspective
– in the first two and half years, and in my opinion it is problematic since psychoanalysis
is not scientifically validated, and have way too much speculation – like if
you have a problem with authority and you are woman is because “you are jealous
of the penis of men” – and silly and ridiculous as it sound there is many psychology
students that prefers studying this perspective over studying basic statistics
or psychometry, and I think is mostly because of the bias of the first semesters.
Then, even when there are many required courses
that have a scientifically and evidenced-proved perspective many choose to not
pay to much attention to them, because “they are not what they need for
practice as a psychologist.”, and better not mention about optional courses
with this perspective, because of the hundred and so students many of these
courses only have like fifteen or ten students – and many of them have been
canceled due this – Some professors say that they do not understand well about
this situation, but they think it is because of the exposed above, that is, the
psychoanalytic bias.
I do not
really have a problem with the people who like reading about this psychology
school. Actually, I enjoy a lot of surreal and dreamlike based art, but it is
art, the problem begins when you study a career that is supposed to help people
who is suffering and apply speculations as a treatment. The least you can do for
the people who place their hopes on you is offering them the best and more
effective treatment.
It's really interesting how such an old and a little retrograde perspective can still be so valid--jj
ResponderEliminar